"Powerful Black Elected Officials like State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., State Senator Borris L. Miles, and United States Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee are well-known figures in the Black Community. However, that's not the only place where this threesome is well-known. Now, while neither has been convicted of any wrongdoing in the 'Absentee Ballot Harvesting Game' yet, their names are at the top of nearly every list I've seen related to this illegal activity. Do you even know what 'Absentee Ballot Harvesting' is? Do you understand how 'Absentee Ballot Harvesting' could be used to determine the outcome of elections? If not, pay close attention because I'm going to illustrate exactly how (3) three candidates with the right resources and influence could flip a county the size of Harris County, Texas by securing 33,600 Absentee Ballots with little to no effort at all on their part in any given election. That being said, please understand that one good "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" could easily secure 400 Absentee Ballots in one day in a local nursing home. So, if a crooked countywide candidate goes out and hires (10) ten Absentee Ballot Harvesters that candidate could easily determine the outcome of every countywide race on a ballot using the (NGP VAN SOFTWARE) system to select all of the candidates they want to win and determine the outcomes of every countywide race on the ballot. Nope, I'm not kidding!!! But don't take my word for it. According to their website, NGP VAN is the leading technology provider to Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations, as well as nonprofits, municipalities, and other groups, offering clients an integrated platform of the best fundraising, compliance, field, organizing, digital, and social networking products."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS
EMAIL: aubreyrtaylor@gmail.com
957 NASA PARKWAY #251
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77058-3039
PHONE: (832)212-8735
CELL: (281)788-3033
STEP #1: The alleged "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" walks into the room of an elderly woman living in a nursing home. In this particular case, the harvester is alleged to have been harvesting ballots for State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., back during the 2018 Midterms.
STEP #2: The alleged "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" approaches the elderly woman living in a nursing home. In this particular case, the harvester is alleged to have been harvesting ballots for State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., back during the 2018 Midterms.
STEP #3: The alleged "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" explains to the elderly voter that she's there to assist her with her absentee ballot. In this particular case, the harvester is alleged to have been harvesting ballots for State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., back during the 2018 Midterms.
STEP #4: The alleged "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" tells the elder voter the name of the candidate to select on the ballot. In this particular case, the harvester is alleged to have been harvesting ballots for State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., back during the 2018 Midterms.
STEP #5: The elderly woman in the nursing home selects the name she's told to select by the alleged "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" on her ballot. In this particular case, the harvester is alleged to have been harvesting ballots for State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., back during the 2018 Midterms.
STEP #6: The elderly woman is told where to sign her name on the "ABSENTEE BALLOT " by the alleged harvester. In this particular case, the harvester is alleged to have been harvesting ballots for State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., back during the 2018 Midterms.
STEP #7: The alleged "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" walks away from the elderly woman in the nursing home with her ballot -- which is illegal. In this particular case, the harvester is alleged to have been harvesting ballots for State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., back during the 2018 Midterms.
STEP #8: The alleged "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" is asked whether what she is doing or not is legal, and she answers yes! She also states that they had already done 400 "ABSENTEE BALLOTS" already.
"The video above gives you a good example of how the "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTING" scheme works in Harris County, Texas. So, as you view the video, please pay close attention to the part where the young lady with a State Rep. Harold Dutton Campaign t-shirt on says , "we've done 400 already," Now, what this young lady is talking about is "ABSENTEE BALLOTS" when she makes that statement. So, for the record, it does not take but one "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" to flip a local race in Harris County, Texas. I believe that it's possible for (1) one absentee ballot harvester to collect as many as 12,000 ballots during a Presidential or Midterm Election cycle for a candidate running countywide in Harris County, Texas. That being said, if a candidate with deep pockets like Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis goes out and hires (10) ten absentee ballot harvesters -- not only is he able to control the outcome of his race; but he could also control the outcomes of every race on the Harris County, Texas. How? Well, with access to (NGP VAN SOFTWARE) a team of (10) ten absentee ballot harvesters could easily secure 120,000 or more, absentee mail-in ballots in a 30 day period."
EXHIBIT #1 -- (VIEW LARGER)
"The image you see above is an example of three "ABSENTEE BALLOTS" with votes cast for only (2) two candidates of the more than (150) one hundred fifty candidates who appeared on the ballot in Harris County, Texas. Now, if you pay close attention you will see that these ballots only have the names of State Representative Harold Dutton, Jr. (HD-142), and U.S. Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee selected out of more than (150) candidates who appeared on the ballot.
EXHIBIT #2 -- (VIEW LARGER)
"You have to remember that Harris County, Texas has the longest ballot in the country. There were over 90 races on the 2018 Democratic Party Primary ballot covering about 150 candidates. Now, as you view the image of the "ABSENTEE BALLOTS" above you have to keep in mind that it's possible for some candidates who appear on the ballot to be "CHEATED FOR WITHOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE" in Harris County, Texas and other counties. The ballots you see above are all from Precinct #259 – in which the voters cast their votes for ALL of the same candidates . However, pay close attention to how all of these supposed voters used the same style “X” to mark their ballots. Also, please note that (Precinct #259) is controlled by Harris County Democratic Party (Election Judge and Precinct Chair) Deborah Adams who happens to be a Black woman whose name continues to come up over and over again in connection to "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTING" in Harris County, Texas.
Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg received a lot of support from "POWER-BROKERS" in the Black community back on Tuesday, March 3, 2020, in her Democratic Party showdown with Audia Jones (African American female), Carvana Cloud (African American female), and Todd Overstreet (White male).
Democratic Precinct Chair and Judge Deborah Adams is pictured above with State Rep. Harold Dutton, Jr., and Harris County Tax-Assessor Collector Ann Harris Bennett. Please note, that there has been no credible evidence found that Republicans are involved in "ABSENTEE BALLOT" fraud in any way, shape, or form in Harris County, Texas. However, as it pertains to some Democrats, clear and compelling evidence that "CHEATING" is taking place has been clearly laid out on the "TEXAS TRASH TALK" website. The results of a 2-year investigation by Colleen M. Vera has been completely detailed and delivered to the Texas Secretary of State along with supportive documents included to support her investigation. However, all of the "DEMOCRATS" listed on this page are presumed to be innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. You can learn more about the laws that are 'allegedly' being broken by some "DEMOCRATS" in Harris County, Texas by clicking this link.
Democratic Precinct Chair Deborah Adams delivered the goods for Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, in Precinct 259. You can learn more about the laws that are 'allegedly' being broken by some "DEMOCRATS" in Harris County, Texas by clicking this link.
The Baptist Ministers of Houston and Vicinity are top players in the Presidential, Midterm, and Municipal Elections throughout this region. If you are a candidate running for office in Houston, Texas, you had better get ready, because you're going to get a call from these guys.
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee has performed astonishingly well over the years in the "ABSENTEE BALLOT" category thanks to people like Gloria Palmer and many others mentioned in the 2-year investigation into "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTING" that was conducted by Colleen M. Vera, of "TEXAS TRASH TALK," a website committed to, "Cleaning up the waste and taking out the trash in government," according to their website.
GLORIA PALMER’S CONNECTION TO THE HONORABLE CONGRESSWOMAN SHEILA JACKSON LEE GOES BACK SEVERAL ELECTION CYCLES
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
The fact that Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee has used Gloria Palmer's services does not make her guilty of anything. The supportive information published below is a sample of some of the transactions between Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, and Gloria Palmer, the "DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVE" who has been identified in Colleen M. Vera's 2-year report as an alleged "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" who has done her business in Harris County for nearly 50 years according to her own admission in audiotapes.
On 2/10/2020, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $180.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN ASSISTANT” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 1/27/2020, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $370.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN ASSISTANT” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 1/24/2020, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $225.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN ASSISTANT” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 1/19/2020, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $330.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN ASSISTANT” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 1/19/2020, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $225.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN ASSISTANT” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 1/15/2020, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $516.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN ASSISTANT” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 2/18/2018, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $240.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee for “CANVASSING” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 2/18/2018, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $370.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee for “CANVASSING” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 2/15/2018, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $370.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN ASSISTANT” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 2/04/2018, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $370.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN WORKER” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 2/01/2018, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $250.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee for “CANVASSING” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 1/28/2018, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $100.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee to pass out “CHURCH LEAFLETS” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Finance Report.
On 1/28/2018, Gloria Palmer the accused “ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER” was paid the sum of $250.00 by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee as a “CAMPAIGN WORKER” according to Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign Report.
PART 1: GLORIA PALMER DISCUSSES HOW SHE WORKS HARD GOING OUT AND GETTING THOSE ABSENTEE BALLOTS
According to Colleen M. Vera, after the 2016 Democratic Primary, a candidate for Harris County Constable (Pct 3), Jasen Rabalais, filed a lawsuit claiming that a campaign worker for another candidate, Michel Pappillion, “deliberately falsified, illegally completed or unlawfully influenced the ballots and early voting applications of elderly residents in Harris County.” The lawsuit was dismissed. But the audiotape above had been made by the Rabalais campaign after he found out that an “alleged harvester” was working for an opponent’s campaign.
PART 2: GLORIA PALMER SHARES EXACTLY HOW THE ABSENTEE BALLOT GAME WORKS IN HARRIS COUNTY
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
In case you don't know, providing unlawful assistance to a voter in connection with “ABSENTEE BALLOT” is a state jail felony from what I understand. However, having “ABSENTEE VOTERS” select one name on their “ABSENTEE BALLOT" and sign their signature, and then taking the ballot with you is something else altogether. In case you don't know, it also illegal to receive compensation for depositing the carrier-envelope in the mail or with a common or contract carrier folks. Gloria Palmer is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. For the record, the audiotape above had been made by the Rabalais campaign after he found out that an “alleged harvester” was working for an opponent’s campaign.
IN THIS AUDIO GLORIA PALMER TRIES TO IMPLICATE DEMOCRATIC PRECINCT JUDGE DEBORAH ADAMS AS PLOT CONTINUES TO THICKEN
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
I'm working hard to provide you with facts guys. Please take a moment to listen to the audio I captured from a recent telephone conversation with Gloria Palmer, the "DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVE" who has been identified as an "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTER" by Colleen M. Vera, in a 2-year investigation for “TEXAS TRASH TALK,” a website that’s committed to "Cleaning up the waste and taking out the trash in government." In the audio clip above you will hear Gloria Palmer clearly try to place blame on Deborah Adams the Democratic Precinct Judge and Chair for Precinct 259, in Harris County, Texas.
IN THIS VIDEO GLORIA PALMER THREATENS TO SICK CONGRESSWOMAN SHEILA JACKSON LEE ON ME
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
Gloria Palmer was out of control. Back during 2020, several sources came forward to tell me that the woman on this audiotape who called to threaten me is indeed Gloria Palmer. She refused to identify herself at the time, but, several people who know her well came forward to state with complete certainty that this is her voice.
AUBREY R. TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS
EMAIL: aubreyrtaylor@gmail.com
957 NASA PARKWAY #251
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77058-3039
PHONE: (832)212-8735
CELL: (281)788-3033
No two signatures should be exactly the same -- right?. Well, after reviewing all the applications from State Representative Harold Dutton’s 2018 race, Colleen M. Vera, as part of her 2-year investigation into "ABSENTEE BALLOT HARVESTING" believes that Texas needs much more ACTUAL SECURITY for Texas' mail ballot system. She believes that signature comparison isn't enough. According to Colleen M. Vera, the only information the voter supplies is a signature -- so that is all that can be compared. State Representative Harold Dutton received twice as many "ABSENTEE BALLOTS" as the second-place finisher, Jerry Davis in the race for State Representative for House District 142, back on Tuesday, March 3, 2020.
Signature Comparisons Isn't Enough to Prevent Fraudulent Activity Whereas Absentee Mail-Ballots is Concerned in Texas
According to Colleen M. Vera: “My original plan had been to compare the voter’s signature on the ballot by mail application to the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope to see if any may not have been signed by the same person. But I found so many other issues that I got sidetracked from the signatures.
Unlike some other states, Texas does not require photocopies of ID to accompany the ballot by mail application. The only “security” Texas statute has in place for ballots by mail is a comparison of the voter’s signature on the application to the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope. Previous signatures going back 6 years may be compared if needed. If the signatures could have been written by the same person, the ballot is approved.
After reviewing all the applications from Dutton’s race, I have concerns that Texas needs much more ACTUAL SECURITY for our mail ballot system. Signature comparison isn't enough. - especially now that voters over 65 are receiving pre-printed applications for ballots by mail from the parties, candidates, and PACs. The only information the voter supplies is a signature - so that is all that can be compared.
In reviewing the pre-printed postcard applications from Dutton's race, we found numerous voters whose first or last names were the same as another voter, and their signatures were remarkably similar."
Some examples of signatures on applications for ballots by mail from TWO or MORE DIFFERENT VOTERS:
Signature Comparisons Isn't Enough to Prevent Fraudulent Activity Whereas Absentee Mail-Ballots is Concerned in Texas
According to Colleen M. Vera: “My original plan had been to compare the voter’s signature on the ballot by mail application to the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope to see if any may not have been signed by the same person. But I found so many other issues that I got sidetracked from the signatures.
Unlike some other states, Texas does not require photocopies of ID to accompany the ballot by mail application. The only “security” Texas statute has in place for ballots by mail is a comparison of the voter’s signature on the application to the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope. Previous signatures going back 6 years may be compared if needed. If the signatures could have been written by the same person, the ballot is approved.
After reviewing all the applications from Dutton’s race, I have concerns that Texas needs much more ACTUAL SECURITY for our mail ballot system. Signature comparison isn't enough. - especially now that voters over 65 are receiving pre-printed applications for ballots by mail from the parties, candidates, and PACs. The only information the voter supplies is a signature - so that is all that can be compared.
In reviewing the pre-printed postcard applications from Dutton's race, we found numerous voters whose first or last names were the same as another voter, and their signatures were remarkably similar."
Some examples of signatures on applications for ballots by mail from TWO or MORE DIFFERENT VOTERS:
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "The two signatures above are supposed to be those of two different voters. Is it just me? Or do these signatures of two different people named "EVELYN" with different last names look nearly identical? CLICK THIS LINK for more supportive documents that prove that fraudulent activities are happening in local Harris County, Texas elections."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "The two signatures above are supposed to be those of two different voters. What's up with this? Is it just me? Or do these signatures of two different people with the last name "HIGH" with different first names look nearly identical? CLICK THIS LINK for more supportive documents that prove that fraudulent activities are happening in local Harris County, Texas elections."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "The two signatures above are supposed to be those of two different voters. You can't make this stuff up. Don't these signatures of two different people with the last name "JACKSON" with different first names look nearly identical? CLICK THIS LINK for more supportive documents that prove that fraudulent activities are happening in local Harris County, Texas elections."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "The three signatures above are supposed to be those of three different voters. What is really going on in Harris County, Texas? Don't these signatures of three different people with the first name "PATRICIA" with different last names look nearly identical? CLICK THIS LINK for more supportive documents that prove that fraudulent activities are happening in local Harris County, Texas elections."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "The two signatures above are supposed to be those of two different voters. What do you think? Are these two different people? Or does it look like the same person signed these two different documents? Don't these signatures of two different people with the last name, but different first names look nearly identical? CLICK THIS LINK for more supportive documents that prove that fraudulent activities are happening in local Harris County, Texas elections."
"House Bill 6 is an act relating to election integrity and preservation of the purity of the ballot box through the prevention of fraud in the conduct of an election; increasing criminal penalties; creating criminal offenses."
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 1.01. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the Election Integrity Protection Act of 2021.
SECTION 1.02. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Act is to exercise the legislature's constitutional authority under Section 4, Article VI, Texas Constitution, to make all laws necessary to detect and punish fraud and preserve the purity of the ballot box.
SECTION 1.03. FINDINGS. The legislature finds that:
(1) full, free, and fair elections are the underpinnings of a stable constitutional democracy;
(2) fraud in elections threatens the stability of a constitutional democracy by undermining public confidence in the legitimacy of public officers chosen by election;
(3) reforms are needed to the election laws of this state to ensure that fraud does not undermine the public confidence in the electoral process;
(4) Section 4, Article VI, Texas Constitution entrusts the enactment of laws to combat fraud in the electoral process to the sound discretion of the legislature; and
(5) the reforms to the election laws of this state made by this Act are not intended to impair the right of free suffrage guaranteed to the people of Texas by the United States and Texas Constitution, but are enacted solely to prevent fraud in the electoral process.
SECTION 1.04. Chapter 1, Election Code, is amended by adding Section 1.0015 to read as follows:
Sec. 1.0015. LEGISLATIVE INTENT. To reduce the likelihood of fraud in the conduct of elections, it is the intent of the legislature that the provisions of this code shall be applied evenly, and the conduct of elections throughout this state shall be uniform and consistent.
SECTION 1.05. Section 1.003, Election Code, is amended by adding Subsection (c) to read as follows:
(c) The provisions of this code shall be strictly construed by a public official to effect the intent of the legislature under
Section 1.0015.
SECTION 1.06. Section 1.005, Election Code, is amended by adding Subdivision (15-a) to read as follows:
(15-a) "Public official" means a person elected, selected, appointed, employed, or otherwise designated as an officer, employee, or agent of this state, a government agency, a political subdivision, or any other public body established by state law.
ARTICLE 2. REGISTRATION AND CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS
SECTION 2.01. Sections 16.001(a) and (b), Election Code, are amended to read as follows:
(a) Each month the local registrar of deaths shall prepare an abstract of each death certificate issued in the month for a decedent 18 years of age or older who was a resident of the state at the time of death. The local registrar of deaths shall file each abstract with the voter registrar of the decedent's county of residence and the secretary of state as soon as possible, but not later than one [the 10th] day after [of the month following the month in which] the abstract is prepared.
(b) Each month the clerk of each court having probate jurisdiction shall prepare an abstract of each application for probate of a will, administration of a decedent's estate, or determination of heirship, and each affidavit under Chapter 205, Estates Code, that is filed in the month with a court served by the clerk. The clerk shall file each abstract with the voter registrar and the secretary of state as soon as possible, but not later than one [the 10th] day after [of the month following the month in which] the abstract is prepared.
SECTION 2.02. Subchapter C, Chapter 125, Election Code, is amended by adding Section 125.0621 to read as follows:
Sec. 125.0621. LOGS OF ISSUED AND SPOILED BALLOTS. If an electronic voting system uses paper media for recording votes cast, the election officer shall maintain a record of the serial numbers of all ballots issued at that polling place and the serial numbers of any spoiled ballots, if any. All logs maintained under this section are election records subject to public inspection as provided by Section 1.012.
ARTICLE 3. ELECTION OFFICERS AND OBSERVERS
SECTION 3.01. Section 32.075, Election Code, is amended by amending adding Subsection (g) to read as follows:
(g) A presiding judge may not:
(1) have a watcher appointed under Subchapter A,
Chapter 33, removed from the polling place; or
(2) require a watcher appointed under Subchapter A,
Chapter 33, to leave the polling place.
SECTION 3.02. Subchapter D, Chapter 32, Election Code, is amended by adding Section 32.077 to read as follows:
Sec. 32.077. REMOVAL OF A POLL WATCHER FROM POLLING PLACE.
A poll watcher may be removed from a polling place only if the poll watcher engages in activity that would constitute an offense related to election fraud, including an offense under Chapter 276.
SECTION 3.03. Chapter 33, Election Code, is amended by adding Section 33.0015 to read as follows:
Sec. 33.0015. PURPOSE. The purpose of this chapter is to preserve the purity of the ballot box in accordance with Section 4,
Article VI, Texas Constitution, by providing for the appointment of watchers to observe the conduct of an election and call to the attention of an election officer potential irregularities or violations of law in the conduct of the election.
SECTION 3.04. Section 33.051, Election Code, is amended by adding Subsections (g) and (h) to read as follows:
(g) An election officer commits an offense if the officer intentionally or knowingly refuses to accept a watcher for service when acceptance of the watcher is required by this section.
(h) An offense under Subsection (g) is a Class B misdemeanor.
SECTION 3.05. Subchapter C, Chapter 33, Election Code, is amended by adding Section 33.0605 to read as follows:
Sec. 33.0605. OBSERVING DATA STORAGE SEALING AND TRANSFER.
A watcher appointed to serve at a polling place in an election may observe the sealing and transfer of a memory card, flash drive, hard drive, data storage device, or other medium now existing or later developed used by the voting system equipment.
SECTION 3.06. The heading to Section 33.061, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 33.061. UNLAWFULLY OBSTRUCTING OR REMOVING WATCHER.
SECTION 3.07. Section 33.061(a), Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) A person commits an offense if the person serves in an official capacity at a location at which the presence of watchers is authorized and knowingly prevents a watcher from observing an activity the watcher is entitled to observe, including by having a watcher removed from the polling place or requiring a watcher to leave the polling place, unless the watcher engages in activity that would constitute an offense related to election fraud, including an offense under Chapter 276.
SECTION 3.08. Section 61.001, Election Code, is amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1) to read as follows:
(a) Except as permitted by this code and as described by Subsection (a-1), a person may not be in the polling place from the time the presiding judge arrives there on election day to make the preliminary arrangements until the precinct returns have been certified and the election records have been assembled for distribution following the election.
(a-1) Under this code, a person may be lawfully present in a polling place during the time described by Subsection (a) if the person is:
(1) an election judge or clerk;
(2) a watcher;
(3) the secretary of state;
(4) a staff member of the elections division of the secretary of state's office when performing an official duty authorized under this code;
(5) a staff member of an election official or sheriff, only when delivering election supplies;
(6) a state inspector;
(7) a person admitted to vote;
(8) a child under 18 years of age who is accompanying a parent who has been admitted to vote;
(9) a person providing assistance to a voter under Section 61.032 or 64.032;
(10) a person accompanying a disabled voter;
(11) a special peace officer appointed by the presiding judge under Section 32.075;
(12) the county chair of a political party conducting a primary election, as authorized by Section 172.1113;
(13) a voting system technician, as authorized by Section 125.010;
(14) the county elections administrator only when performing an official duty authorized by this code;
(15) a person whose presence has been authorized by the presiding judge and the alternate presiding judge in accordance with this code.
SECTION 3.09. Section 86.006, Election Code, is amended by amending Subsection (a-1) to read as follows:
(a-1) The voter may deliver a marked ballot in person to the early voting clerk's office only while the polls are open on election day. A voter who delivers a marked ballot in person must present an acceptable form of identification described by Section
63.0101. A poll watcher is entitled to observe the delivery of ballots under this subsection. The poll watcher must be able to determine how the ballots are being delivered and how election officials are making decisions about the delivery of ballots, if applicable. The poll watcher may not disrupt the process of delivering ballots.
SECTION 3.10. Section 87.026, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 87.026. BYSTANDERS EXCLUDED. (a) Except as permitted by this code and as described by Subsection (b), a person may not be in the meeting place of an early voting ballot board during the time of the board's operations.
(b) Under this code, a person may be lawfully present in the meeting place of an early voting ballot board during the time of the board's operations if the person is:
(1) a presiding judge or member of the board;
(2) a watcher;
(3) a voting system technician, as authorized by Section 125.010;
(4) a county elections administrator only when performing an official duty authorized by this code; or
(5) a person whose presence has been authorized by the presiding judge and the alternate presiding judge in accordance with this code.
SECTION 3.11. Subchapter A, Chapter 127, Election Code, is amended by adding Section 127.008 to read as follows:
Sec. 127.008. BYSTANDERS EXCLUDED. (a) Except as permitted by this code and as described by Subsection (b), a person may not be in a central counting station while ballots are being counted.
(b) Under this code, a person may be lawfully present in the central counting station while ballots are being counted if the person is:
(1) a counting station manager, tabulation supervisor, assistant to the tabulation supervisor, presiding judge, or clerk;
(2) a watcher;
(3) a voting system technician, as authorized by Section 125.010;
(4) a county elections administrator only when performing an official duty authorized by this code; or
(5) a person whose presence has been authorized by the counting station manager in accordance with this code.
ARTICLE 4. ASSISTANCE OF VOTERS
SECTION 4.01. Subchapter B, Chapter 64, Election Code, is amended by adding Section 64.0322 to read as follows:
Sec. 64.0322. SUBMISSION OF FORM BY ASSISTANT. (a) A person, other than an election officer, who assists a voter in accordance with this chapter is required to complete a form stating:
(1) the name and address of the person assisting the voter;
(2) the manner in which the person is assisting the voter;
(3) the reason the assistance is necessary; and
(4) the relationship of the assistant to the voter.
(b) When submitting the form required by this section, a person must present an acceptable form of identification described by Section 63.0101.
(c) The secretary of state shall prescribe the form required by this section. The form must be incorporated into the official carrier envelope if the voter is voting an early voting ballot by mail and receives assistance under Section 86.010, or must be submitted to an election officer at the time the voter casts a ballot if the voter is voting at a polling place or under Section 64.009.
SECTION 4.02. Section 64.034, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 64.034. OATH. A person selected to provide assistance to a voter must take the following oath, administered by an election officer at the polling place, before providing assistance:
"I swear (or affirm) that I will not suggest, by word, sign, or gesture, how the voter should vote; I will confine my assistance to answering the voter's questions, to stating propositions on the ballot, and to naming candidates and, if listed, their political parties; I will prepare the voter's ballot as the voter directs; I did not pressure or intimidate the voter into choosing me to provide assistance; and I am not the voter's employer, an agent of the voter's employer, or an officer or agent of a labor union to which the voter belongs."
SECTION 4.03. Section 86.0052, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 86.0052. COMPENSATION FOR CARRIER ENVELOPE ACTION PROHIBITED. (a) A person commits an offense if the person:
(1) compensates or offers to compensate another person for depositing the carrier envelope in the mail or with a common or contract carrier as provided by Section 86.0051(b)[, as part of any performance-based compensation scheme based on the number of ballots deposited or in which another person is presented with a quota of ballots to deposit as provided by Section 86.0051(b)]; or
(2) [engages in another practice that causes another person's compensation from or employment status with the person to be dependent on the number of ballots deposited as provided by
Section 86.0051(b); or
[(3)] [with knowledge that accepting compensation for such activity is illegal,] solicits, receives, or accepts compensation for an activity described by Subdivision (1) [or (2)].
(b) [Except as provided by Subsection (c), an offense under this section is a misdemeanor punishable by:
(1) confinement in jail for a term of not more than one year or less than 30 days; or
(2) confinement described by Subdivision (1) and a fine not to exceed $4,000.
(c)] An offense under this section is a state jail felony if it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant was previously convicted two or more times under this section.
(c) [(d)] An officer, director, or other agent of an entity that commits an offense under this section is punishable for the offense.
(d) [(e)] For purposes of this section, compensation means any form of monetary payment, goods, services, benefits, or promises or offers of employment, political favor, official act of discretion, or any other form of consideration offered to another person in exchange for depositing ballots.
SECTION 4.04. Section 86.010, Election Code, is amended by amending Subsections (e), (h), and (i) and adding Subsection (i-1) to read as follows:
(e) A person who assists a voter to prepare a ballot to be voted by mail shall enter on the official carrier envelope of the voter:
(1) the person's signature, printed name, and residence address;
(2) the manner of any assistance provided to the voter by the person; and
(3) the relationship of the person providing the assistance to the voter [on the official carrier envelope of the voter].
(h) Subsection (f) does not apply to:
(1) a violation of Subsection (c), if the person is related to the voter within the second degree by affinity or the third degree by consanguinity, as determined under Subchapter B,
Chapter 573, Government Code, or was physically living in the same dwelling as the voter at the time of the event; or
(2) a violation of Subsection (e), if the person is related to the voter within the second degree by affinity or the third degree by consanguinity, as determined under Subchapter B,
Chapter 573, Government Code.
(i) An offense under this section for a violation of Subsection (c) is increased to the next higher category of offense if it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that:
(1) the defendant was previously convicted of an offense under this code;
(2) the offense involved a voter 65 years of age or older; or
(3) the defendant committed another offense under this section in the same election.
(i-1) An offense under this section for a violation of Subsection (e) is a felony of the third degree if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the person committed an offense under
Section 64.036 for providing unlawful assistance to the same voter in connection with the same ballot.
SECTION 4.05. Section 86.0105, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 86.0105. COMPENSATION FOR ASSISTING VOTERS
PROHIBITED. (a) A person commits an offense if the person:
(1) compensates or offers to compensate another person for assisting voters as provided by Section 86.010[, as part of any performance-based compensation scheme based on the number of voters assisted or in which another person is presented with a quota of voters to be assisted as provided by Section 86.010]; or
(2) [engages in another practice that causes another person's compensation from or employment status with the person to be dependent on the number of voters assisted as provided by Section
86.010; or
[(3)] [with knowledge that accepting compensation for such activity is illegal,] solicits, receives, or accepts compensation for an activity described by Subdivision (1) [or (2)].
(b) [Except as provided by Subsection (c), an offense under this section is a misdemeanor punishable by:
(1) confinement in jail for a term of not more than one year or less than 30 days; or
(2) confinement described by Subdivision (1) and a fine not to exceed $4,000.
(c)] An offense under this section is a state jail felony [if it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant was previously convicted two or more times under this section].
(c) [(d)] An officer, director, or other agent of an entity that commits an offense under this section is punishable for the offense.
(d) [(e)] For purposes of this section, compensation means any form of monetary payment, goods, services, benefits, or promises or offers of employment, political favor, official act of discretion, or any other form of consideration offered to another person in exchange for assisting voters.
SECTION 4.06. Section 86.013, Election Code, is amended by amending Subsection (b) to read as follows:
(b) Spaces must appear on the reverse side of the official carrier envelope for:
(1) indicating the identity and date of the election; [and]
(2) entering the signature, printed name, and residence address of a person other than the voter who deposits the carrier envelope in the mail or with a common or contract carrier; and
(3) indicating the manner of any assistance provided by a person assisting the voter, and the relationship of that person to the voter.
ARTICLE 5. FRAUD AND UNLAWFUL PRACTICES
SECTION 5.01. Chapter 63, Election Code, is amended by adding Section 63.0111 to read as follows:
Sec. 63.0111. OFFENSES RELATED TO PROVISIONAL VOTING. (a)
An election judge commits an offense if the judge knowingly provides a voter with a form for an affidavit required by Section
63.001 if the form contains false information entered thereon by the judge.
(d) An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
SECTION 5.02. Section 64.012(a), Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) A person commits an offense if the person:
(1) votes or attempts to vote in an election in which the person knows the person is not eligible to vote;
(2) knowingly votes or attempts to vote more than once in an election;
(3) knowingly votes or attempts to vote a ballot belonging to another person, or by impersonating another person; [or]
(4) knowingly marks or attempts to mark any portion of another person's ballot without the consent of that person, or without specific direction from that person how to mark the ballot; or
(5) knowingly votes or attempts to vote in an election in this state after voting in an election in another state that is held on the same day.
SECTION 5.03. Sections 276.012, Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 276.012. ENGAGING IN ORGANIZED ELECTION FRAUD
ACTIVITY. (a) A person commits an offense if, with the intent to establish, maintain, further, or participate in a vote harvesting organization, the person:
(1) commits or conspires to commit one or more offenses under Titles 1 through 7;
(2) directly or through a third party, provides or offers to provide vote harvesting services to a candidate for office in exchange for compensation or other benefit;
(3) directly, or through a third party, offers or provides compensation or other benefit to another person in exchange for vote harvesting services; or
(4) knowingly collects or possesses a mail ballot or official carrier envelope from a voter in connection with vote harvesting services.
(b) An offense listed under Subsections (a)(2), (3), or (4) is a third degree felony. Except as provided by Subsection (c), an offense listed under Subsection (a)(1) is one category higher than the most serious offense listed in Subsection (a)(1) that is committed, and if the most serious offense is a Class A misdemeanor, the offense is a state jail felony. If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under any other law, the actor may be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.
(c) At the punishment stage of a trial, the defendant may raise the issue as to whether in voluntary and complete renunciation of the offense the defendant withdrew from the vote harvesting organization before commission of an offense listed in
Subsection (a)(1) and made substantial effort to prevent the commission of the offense. If the defendant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the offense is the same category of offense as the most serious offense listed in
Subsection (a)(1) that is committed.
(d) In this section: [,]
(1) "Benefit" has the meaning assigned by Section
36.01(3), Penal Code.
(2) "Vote [vote] harvesting organization" means three or more persons who collaborate in committing offenses under Titles 1 through 7, although participants may not know each other's identity, membership in the organization may change from time to time, and participants may stand in a candidate-consultant, donor-consultant, consultant-field operative, or other arm's length relationship in the organization's operations; and
(3) "Vote harvesting services" means personal services that include direct interaction with one or more voters in connection with an official ballot, ballot by mail, or an application for ballot by mail that are performed with the intention that ballot be cast for a specific candidate or measure.
SECTION 5.04. Sections 276.013(a) and (b), Election Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly or intentionally makes any effort to:
(1) influence the independent exercise of the vote of another in the presence of the ballot or during the voting process;
(2) cause a voter to become registered, a ballot to be obtained, or a vote to be cast under false pretenses; [or]
(3) count invalid votes or alter a report to include invalid votes;
(4) fail to count valid votes or alter a report to exclude valid votes; or
[(3)] (5) cause any intentionally misleading statement, representation, or information to be provided:
(A) to an election official; or
(B) on an application for ballot by mail, carrier envelope, or any other official election-related form or document.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the second degree [Class A misdemeanor].
SECTION 5.05. Chapter 276, Election Code, is amended by adding Sections 276.014, 276.015, 276.016, 276.017, and 276.018 to read as follows:
Sec. 276.015. UNLAWFUL SOLICITATION OR DISTRIBUTION OF APPLICATION TO VOTE BY MAIL. (a) This section applies to an application to vote by mail required under Section 84.001.
(b) A public official commits an offense if the public official knowingly:
(1) solicits the submission of an application by a person who did not request the application;
(2) distributes an application to a person who did not request the application, unless the distribution is expressly authorized by another provision of this code;
(3) authorizes the expenditure of public funds to facilitate third party distribution of an application to a person who did not request the application; or
(4) completes any portion of an application to vote by mail and distributes the application to an applicant with intent that the applicant will submit the application on the applicant's
behalf to the early voting clerk.
(c) An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
(d) It is an exception to the application of Subsection
(b)(4) that the public official lawfully assisted the applicant as authorized under Section 84.003.
Sec. 276.016. UNLAWFUL DISTRIBUTION OF BALLOTS AND BALLOTING MATERIALS. (a) The early voting clerk or other election official may not knowingly mail or distribute a ballot or balloting materials for an early voting ballot to be voted by mail to a person other than the applicant who submitted the application required by
Section 84.001.
(b) A person who violates this section commits an offense.
An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
Sec. 276.017. PERJURY IN CONNECTION WITH CERTAIN VOTING PROCEDURES. (a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to deceive and with knowledge of the statement's meaning, the person makes a false statement when making the oath described by Section
64.034 or swears to the truth of a false statement previously made when making the oath described by Section 64.034.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor except that the punishment for an offense under this section is a state jail felony if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the person made a false statement under Subsection (a) three or more times in connection with a single election.
Sec. 276.018. UNLAWFUL ALTERING OF ELECTION PROCEDURES.
(a) A public official may not knowingly issue an order altering or suspending an election standard, practice, or procedure mandated by law or rule unless the alteration or suspension is expressly authorized under this code.
(b) It is an exception to the application of this provision that a public official seeking to alter any voting standard, practice, or procedure in a manner not otherwise expressly authorized by the Election Code:
(1) first requested approval of the proposed alteration from the secretary of state by submitting a written request for approval to the secretary of state; and
(2) the secretary of state by written order approved the proposed alteration requested under Subdivision (1).
(c) A public official who violates this section commits an offense. An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
ARTICLE 6. ENFORCEMENT
SECTION 6.01. Chapter 2, Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended by adding Section 2.075 to read as follows:
Art. 2.075. ATTORNEY PRO TEM IN CERTAIN ELECTION CASES. (a)
If an attorney for the state is presented with the requisite number of affidavits under Section 273.001, Election Code, on or after the 60th day before the date of a regular or special election that allege criminal conduct that would constitute an offense under
Chapter 276, Election Code, the attorney for the state shall determine if the investigation can be conducted expeditiously by the attorney or the attorney's staff so that a presentation of an information or indictment may be made in time to prevent ongoing or deter future criminal activity constituting an offense under
Chapter 276, Election Code.
(b) The attorney for the state shall make the determination required under Subsection (a) not later than the 48th hour after the affidavits are presented.
(c) If the attorney for the state determines that an investigation cannot be completed expeditiously as provided by
Subsection (a), the attorney shall notify the presiding judge of the court of criminal appeals not later than the 24th hour after the time of determination. A three-judge panel shall be appointed as provided under Subsection (d). The panel shall appoint, from any county or district, an attorney for the state to perform the duties of the office in connection with the investigation of the presented affidavits.
(d) The presiding judge of the court of criminal appeals shall appoint a three-judge panel in the same manner and under the same conditions as the appointment by the chief justice of the supreme court of a three-judge panel under Chapter 22A, Government Code.
(b) An attorney pro tem appointed under this article is subject to the limitations in Article 2.07(b).
(c) In this article, "attorney for the state" has the meaning assigned by Article 2.07(d).
SECTION 6.02. Subchapter A, Chapter 22, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 22.0015 to read as follows:
Sec. 22.0015. PRIORITY OF APPEALS IN CERTAIN ELECTION CASES. Beginning on the 60th day before the date of a regular or special election, the supreme court must give absolute preference to a matter that is related to a request for injunctive relief under
Section 273.081, Election Code, that is prompted by an allegation of activity that would constitute an offense under Chapter 276, Election Code. After assignment of the matter under Section 22.222(b), the supreme court shall promptly hear the appeal, by electronic means or otherwise, after the clerk of the court receives a written request for oral argument. The supreme court must hear an appeal under this section not later than the 24th hour after the time the last brief permitted to be filed in the appeal is filed.
SECTION 6.03. Chapter 22, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 22.2205 to read as follows:
Sec. 22.2205. PRIORITY OF APPEALS IN CERTAIN ELECTION CASES. Beginning on the 60th day before the date of a regular or special election, a court of appeals must give absolute preference to a matter that is related to a request for injunctive relief under
Section 273.081, Election Code, that is prompted by an allegation of activity that would constitute an offense under Chapter 276, Election Code. After assignment of the matter under Section 22.222(b), the court of appeals shall promptly hear the appeal, by electronic means or otherwise, after the clerk of the court receives a written request for oral argument. A court of appeals shall hear an appeal under this section not later than the 24th hour after the time the last brief permitted to be filed in the appeal is filed.
SECTION 6.04. Section 22.222, Government Code, is amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (a-1) and (b-1) to read as follows:
(b) If more than one panel is used, the court of appeals shall establish rules to periodically rotate the justices among the panels. Permanent civil panels and criminal panels without rotation may not be established. Notwithstanding any other law, including a rule adopted under Sec. 22.004 or a local rule of administration, all cases entitled to priority treatment under Section 23.101(b-1) in the courts of appeals shall be docketed by the clerk of the court and assigned by the clerk to a panel of three judges assigned using an automated system.
(b-1) It is an offense for any person, including a public official, to communicate with a clerk of the court in an attempt to influence the assignment of or withhold the assignment of a justice identified by name or political party to a panel hearing an appeal.
An offense under this subsection is a state jail felony. As used in the section, the term "public official" has the meaning assigned by
Section 1.005(15-a), Election Code.
SECTION 6.05. Section 23.101, Government Code, is amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsection (b-1) read as follows
(b) Insofar as practicable, and except as provided by Subsection (b-1), the trial courts shall observe the preference provided by Subsection (a) in ruling on, hearing, and trying the matters pending before the courts.
(b-1) Beginning on the 60th day before the date of a regular or special election, a trial court must give absolute preference to a matter under Subsection (a)(1) that is a request for injunctive relief under Section 273.081, Election Code, that is prompted by an allegation of activity that would constitute an offense under
Chapter 276, Election Code. After assignment of the matter under Section 24.035, the trial court shall promptly conduct a hearing, by electronic means or otherwise, after the judge receives a written hearing request. A trial court must hear a matter under this subsection not later than the 24th hour after the time the hearing request was received.
SECTION 6.06. Chapter 24, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 24.035 to read as follows:
Sec. 24.035. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES IN DISTRICT COURTS IN CERTAIN ELECTION CASES. (a) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, including a rule adopted under Sec. 22.004 or a local rule of administration, all cases entitled to priority treatment under Section 23.101(b-1) in the district courts of a county shall be docketed and assigned at random by the district clerk using an automated system.
(b) In assigning a case to a district court, the district clerk shall take into consideration any requirement in law that a district court in that county give preference to specific matters.
(c) If a county court has concurrent jurisdiction with a district court over cases entitled to priority treatment under
Section 23.101(b-1), the county clerk shall perform the duties of the district clerk under Subsections (a) and (b).
(d) It is an offense for a person, including a public official, to communicate with a district or county clerk in an attempt to influence the assignment of cases or withhold the assignment of cases to a judge identified by name or political party. An offense under this subsection is a state jail felony. As used in the section, the term "public official" has the meaning assigned by Section 1.005(15-a), Election Code.
ARTICLE 7. TRANSITION; EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 7.01. The change in law made by this Act applies only to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act. An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred before that date.
SECTION 7.02. This Act takes effect September 1, 2021.
Aubrey R. Taylor: "I salute "Dr. Nissi" Hamilton for all of her advocacy work, dedication, passion, and appeal to elected leaders from both major political parties in her ongoing fight to combat Human Trafficking."
Aubrey R. Taylor: "I would like to kindly thank Attorney Nyanza Moore for finding value in our "SISTERHOOD SERIES" and our mission to inform, and empower our readership. These are difficult times that we are living in right now, and we can only thrive by having more open-minded people like Attorney Nyanza Moore to find value in what we do. So, if you were adversely affected by the "2021 Deadly Freeze" in Texas, please call my girl Nyanza at (503)601-6169 today!"
Aubrey R. Taylor: "Few people know that back in July 1992, Quanell X found his brother Quinten Evans dead in his apartment with three others, all with bullets to their heads. So, if there's anyone out there who understand the pain victims of violence feel -- it's Quanell X. And I would like to kindly thank Quanell for finding value in our "SISTERHOOD SERIES" and our mission to inform, and empower our readership. Call the Quanell X "justice line" at (713)221-3200 for assistance."
"I thank God everyday for blessing me with Dr. Steven F. Hotze, M.D., as a client and friend. I would like to kindly thank Dr. Hotze for seeing the value in supporting our "SISTERHOOD SERIES" movement. His support of our mission to inform, and empower our readership is very much appreciated. During difficult times like these when businesses are struggling to survive, having someone like Dr. Hotze find value in what I'm doing to bring people together on common ground is very uplifting and inspiring."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS
EMAIL: aubreyrtaylor@gmail.com
957 NASA PARKWAY #251
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77058-3039
PHONE: (832)212-8735
CELL: (281)788-3033
The 5 Star General Joins Aubrey R. Taylor Communications in Recognizing and Saluting Democratic and Republican Women in Texas Politics
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
I would like to take this moment to thank Gerry Wayne Monroe for finding value in supporting our "SISTERHOOD SERIES" movement. In case you don’t know him, Gerry Wayne Monroe “THE 5 STAR GENERAL” is a lifelong resident of Houston, Texas. ‘5 STAR’ was born and raised in the historic 3rd Ward in Houston, Texas. He graduated from high school back in 1986, from Jack Yates Sr. High School. For those of you who don’t know, ‘5 STAR’ is also a member of the 1985 Jack Yates Championship Football team. And get this, after a by chance meeting with investigative reporter Wayne Dolcefino, or what media mogul Oprah Winfrey calls an “AHAH MOMENT” he started Monroe Consultations. His firm specializes in Education advocacy and political consulting. And for the past 8 years Monroe has taken on well over 195 assignments, and (according to him) has solved every issue that he’s touched. “My specialty is holding elected officials accountable. And in accordance with my goal to do so, I recently went back to further my education in the area of Criminal Justice and recently graduated from Center Texas College,” he says. Thru his community and civic engagement, he's helped thousands of kids and community members regain the hope that they lost – I’ve seen this first hand.
AUBREY R. TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS
EMAIL: aubreyrtaylor@gmail.com
957 NASA PARKWAY #251
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77058-3039
PHONE: (832)212-8735
CELL: (281)788-3033
AUBREY R. TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS
957 NASA PARKWAY #251
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77058-3039
PHONE: (832)212-8735
CELL: (281)788-3033
Judge Jim Kovach will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Judge, Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 2. So, please cast your vote for Judge Jim Kovach on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Kovach in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Dedra Davis will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for District Judge, 270th Civil District Court. So, please cast your vote for Judge Dedra Davis on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Davis in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Cory Sepolio will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for District Judge, 269th Civil District Court. So, please cast your vote for Judge Cory Sepolio on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Sepolio in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Erica Hughes will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Judge, Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 3. So, please cast your vote for Judge Erica Hughes on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Hughes in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Donna Roth will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for District Judge, 295th Civil District Court. So, please cast your vote for Judge Donna Roth on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Roth in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Michelle Moore will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Juvenile District Judge, 314th Judicial District Court. So, please cast your vote for Judge Michelle Moore on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Moore in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Sonya Heath will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Family District Judge, 210th Judicial District Court. So, please cast your vote for Judge Sonya Heath on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Heath in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Attorney Tamika "Tami" Craft will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for District Judge, 195th Civil District Court. So, please cast your vote for Attorney Tamika "Tami" Craft on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Attorney Craft in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Lauren Reeder will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for District Judge, 234th Civil District Court. So, please cast your vote for Judge Lauren Reeder on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Reeder in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Tonya Jones will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Judge, Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 3. So, please cast your vote for Judge Tonya Jones on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Jones in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Raul Rodriguez will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Judge, Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 13. So, please cast your vote for Judge Raul Rodriguez on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Rodriguez in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Angela Graves will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Judge, Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 3. So, please cast your vote for Judge Angela Graves Harrington on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas.
Judge Angela D. Rodriguez will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Harris County Justice of the Peace, Precinct 6, Place 2. So, please cast your vote for Judge Angela D. Rodriguez on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Rodriguez in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
Judge Lucia Bates will be on the Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Democratic Party Primary ballot in the race for Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3, Place 2, in Harris County, Texas. So, please cast your vote for Judge Lucia Bates on "SUPER TUESDAY" in the Democratic Party Primary in Harris County, Texas. However, if you know of any reason why we should not endorse Judge Bates in the 2022 Democratic Party Primary, please call Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper© at (281)788-3033, prior to the Monday, December 13, 2021 filing deadline.
AUBREY R. TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS
EMAIL: aubreyrtaylor@gmail.com
957 NASA PARKWAY #251
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77058-3039
PHONE: (832)212-8735
CELL: (281)788-3033
Nominating the Wrong Candidates on "SUPER TUESDAY" Could Have Disastrous Consequences in the November 2022 General Election in Harris County
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
Make no mistake about it, who the people of Harris County, Texas choose to give another term to in 2022 must be about substance, job performance, judicial temperament, competence, and whether or not our members of the judiciary are following the law with their rulings. And that being said, in 2022, it is incumbent upon the voters of Harris County to evaluate the job performance of each and every sitting "ELECTED OFFICIAL" on a case-by-case basis and not as a group based on their political party affiliation, ethnicity, or gender.
THINKING ABOUT RUNNING?
If you are a candidate planning to run for office in 2022, you have to select the right candidate to run against. And the second most important thing to understand is that you have to select your race early, to avoid ending up in a crowded field of candidates on "SUPER TUESDAY" in Harris County, Texas. So, if you need assistance trying to determine which race to enter, please call (281)788-3033, and I will do my very best to answer any questions you may have.
