AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
We’re starting to now get more clarity as the discovery process starts to unfold with all these Republican-filed lawsuits. Just yesterday, attorney Ryan MacLeod, according to the court proceedings I watched via Zoom, appears to have uncovered a “TREASURE TROVE” of communications that could eventually pose a serious problem for attorney Andy Taylor, and the Harris County Republican Party very soon.
Specifically, the communications in question, could end up becoming a problem for Justice Kevin Jewell (Republican), who currently serves on the 14th Court of Appeals, Place 2, in Texas. Why? Well, the emails that have been discovered by attorney Ryan MacLeod appear to show that Justice Kevin Jewell, a sitting Republican justice, may have been involved in the strategic planning of the lawsuits that have been filed against Democrats in Harris County, Texas, related to the events that unfolded on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in the midterms.
“POSSIBLE ETHICAL ISSUES.”
At this point, nobody has alleged that Justice Kevin Jewell has done anything wrong, or broken any laws, or anything like that from what I witnessed. However, if he was indeed involved in the strategic planning of the lawsuits, that could be problematic. And Justice Kevin Jewell’s alleged involvement could create future “ETHICAL ISSUES” which may have to be resolved by the court system at a future date and time, as these “ELECTION CONTESTS” progress through the courts.
“LUNCEFORD VERSUS CRAFT.”
The case of Erin Elizabeth Lunceford, versus Judge Tamika “Tami” Craft, who currently presides over the 189th Civil District Court, in Harris County, Texas, took a strange twist yesterday in court.
Attorney Ryan MacLeod, indicated yesterday (Thursday, February 16, 2023) that one of the emails sent by attorney Andy Taylor, who represents former Judge Erin Elizabeth Lunceford in her lawsuit against Judge Craft, stated that this was the easiest case he ever handled.
So, what’s the problem with the statement made by attorney Andy Taylor? Well, nothing really, unless attorney Andy Taylor somehow knows how the cases are going to be ruled on at the Texas court of appeals level, or something like that – then we would have a serious problem.
Anyways, the emails discovered by attorney Ryan MacLeod also seem to indicate that the Harris County Republican Party, which is presided over by Cindy Siegel was engaging in some sort of strategy discussions with sitting Republican judges and other powerful elected officials before these lawsuits were filed.
Now, at this time, it is unclear whether Gov. Greg Abbott (Republican), Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (Republican), or Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg (Democrat) were involved in the strategy discussions uncovered in the emails. However, both Abbott and Pattrick are making it known that they are in favor of a new election being ordered for Harris County, Texas.
“PAY CLOSE ATTENTION.”
The time has come for local community leaders and public officials to start paying closer attention to these “ELECTION CONTESTS” that are being presided over by Judge David Peeples, on Thursdays, via Zoom.
In case you're wondering, my assessment of Judge David Peeples’ work so far is that this Republican judge appears to be making a ‘good-faith effort’ in his quest to get things right and follow the law. Especially so, when it comes to the case involving Tami Pierce (Republican), versus Judge DaSean Jones (Democrat), who currently serves as the presiding judge for the 180th Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas.
Judge DaSean Jones’s lawyer, “Downtown” Oliver Brown has filed an Anti-SLAPP motion that requires the Court to address the validity of the election contest that has been filed against his client (Judge DaSean Jones) by Tami Pierce within 60 days.
Running for public office in America is the epitome of “FREE SPEECH” as it relates to the First Amendment and exercising your “CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS” if you ask me.
In case you don't know, when Judge DaSean Jones and Tami Pierce ran for the 180th Criminal District Court, back on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, they were both exercising their right to free speech.
There are four basic types of speeches. Now, just so you know, the four basic types of speeches are: to inform, to instruct, to entertain, and to persuade. And when a candidate places their name on a ballot to run for public office, they're informing the general public that they want to serve them as an elected official. And then, through running campaigns, these people are trying to persuade the general public who are registered (voters) to cast ballots their vote for their candidacy.
“FREEDOM OF SPEECH” does not stop with the candidates when it comes to politics. The voters themselves are afforded the ability to support, political movements, and candidates as they make their voices heard at the ballot box.
Every legal vote that was cast back on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in Harris County, Texas was a registered voter exercising their right to "FREE SPEECH" by voicing their opinion, for, or against, a candidate who was present on the ballot in each specific contest.
Now, from what I understand, if Judge David Peeples somehow fails to rule on the Anti-SLAPP motion within the allowed 60-day timeframe, then the parties can automatically appeal. "The strategy I’ve used is being employed to resolve an open question of law that has not been litigated. However, I’m certain that we will see changes to the law from these election contests," says “Downtown” Oliver Brown.
From what I can see, attorney “Downtown” Oliver Brown, appears to be right. And ultimately, Judge David Peeples or a judge of a higher court is going to without question be forced to agree with Brown's Anti-SLAPP motion.
Judge David Peeples is a very good judge, and he’s very knowledgeable too. However, many other lawyers, and perhaps even a few judges, don’t understand what an Anti-SLAPP motion is all about.
SLAPP is an acronym that stands for “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation.” And SLAPPs are lawsuits that are filed in many cases to intimidate and silence people from exercising their right to freely speak their minds and exercise their “FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT” to free speech.
When an attorney files an Anti-SLAPP motion, like “Downtown” Oliver Brown has done for his client, Judge DaSean Jones (a Democrat), what he’s trying to do is prevent, Tami Pierce, and the former Chairman of the Harris County Republican Party Paul Simpson, from using the courts to intimidate his client (Judge DaSean Jones) who was only exercising his “FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT” when he ran for office.
So, in essence, attorney “Downtown” Oliver Brown has done the right thing for his client, by filing his Anti-SLAPP motion, on behalf of Judge DaSean Jones. Why? Well, because running for public office is a protected form of speech that is a matter of public concern.
What does a matter of public concern? Well, the United States Supreme Court has already decided numerous cases that involved speech addressing matters of public concern; but I’m not going to get into those right now. However, just so you know, matters of public concern are those, “relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community” or “is subject to legitimated news interests; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the general public.”
Now, I’m not a lawyer, nor do I ever plan to become one; but “Downtown” Oliver Brown, appears to have placed Tami Pierce, and her lawyer between a rock and a hard place in my opinion.
Attorney Paul Simpson, and Tami Pierce, are facing the daunting task of proving the claims that they’ve alleged in their lawsuit against Judge DaSean Jones.
They, (Paul Simpson and Tami Pierce), have had the burden of proof placed squarely on their shoulders by attorney “Downtown” Oliver Brown and should be compelled by Judge David Peoples to show him that they have evidence that will cause them to prevail in their suit, and achieve a favorable verdict. Which they may have difficulty doing at this time. Thus, if they cannot meet the burden of proof Judge Peeples may be forced to dismiss their claim against Judge DaSean Jones, and order Tami Pierce to pay Judge Jones’s legal fees.
“THE ANTI-SLAPP MOTION.”
As I’ve already said, attorney “Downtown” Oliver Brown filed an Anti-SLAPP motion which requires the Court to address the validity of the election contest within 60 days. If the court fails to rule then the parties can automatically appeal.
Attorney “Downtown” Oliver Brown is also challenging the form of the election contest on the basis that Tami Pierce did not attach a proper notice form to her lawsuit. Her attorney (of counsel) Paul Simpson argued this provision does not apply to this specific lawsuit, but attorney Brown disagrees.
Yesterday, the Court heard oral arguments in the Pierce versus Jones case. For the record, “Downtown” Oliver Brown argued that Judge DaSean Jones’s constitutional rights of freedom of speech and freedom of association are implicated by Tami Pierce’s lawsuit.
Pierce is arguing that the Anti-SLAPP statute does not apply to an election contest. So, as it stands right now, Judge David Peeples will have to decide this issue. However, from what I can see, the strategy being used deployed by Brown is a new one and may have to ultimately be decided by the Court of Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court, if “Downtown” Oliver Brown’s Anti-SLAPP motion is denied by Judge Peoples.
“Downtown” Oliver Brown also argued that Tami Pierce has not presented any real evidence of fraud, mistake, or illegality on behalf of his client. As for Paul Simpson, he argued that he only needs to assert a prima facie case to survive the Anti-SLAPP motion filed on behalf of Judge Jones, by attorney Brown.
“KIM OGG’S SURROGATES.”
As for Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, we already know, that she played strategically from both sides of the political aisle, back during the 2022 Midterm Election cycle, and that she’s also planning to play strategically from the Democratic side, and the Republican side during the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election cycle.
My investigative team and I, have also proven the fact that “Democrat” Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg’s Office colluded with Republicans to fill out the remainder of their Tuesday, March 1, 2022, Midterm Election Primary ballot.
It’s also an undeniable fact that Kim Ogg has dispatched several of her surrogates, who have strategically embedded themselves inside the upper ranks of the Harris County Republican Party, and are acting as spies for Ogg, as they carry out their seek-and-destroy mission.
“THE “DIRTY” HOOPERS.”
As it stands right now, Don Hooper, the precinct chairman for “PRECINCT 0016,” and his wife Rachel Hooper, who serves as “LEGAL COUNSEL” for the Republican Party of Texas, are the chief surrogates that Ogg is relying on for information related to the inner-workings of the Harris County Republican Party. And trust me when I tell you that Don Hooper, and his wife Rachel Hooper, aren’t afraid to get down and dirty, as they carry out their seek-and-destroy mission. However, Kim Ogg’s surrogates hit a snag the other night when their efforts were blocked by Harris County Republican Party Precinct Chairs.
According to my sources, Don Hooper, looked like a complete idiot on February 13, 2023, as he waited patiently, to file a “RESOLUTION” that he claimed was being filed to address important issues related to election integrity and litigation. However, Don Hooper, who is also a documented drunk, who has been arrested twice and charged with DWI’s never got a chance to have his resolution heard.
What’s wrong with Don Hooper? Oh, I keep forgetting that a psychiatric evaluation was ordered in his divorce proceeding with his last wife by the name of Karen.
Right before Don Hooper’s turn came to introduce his so-called “TRANSPARENCY IN ELECTION INTEGRITY RESOLUTION” on the night of February 13, 2023, a true Conservative stood up and made a motion to adjourn the meeting, to which, nearly everyone present in the room full of Republicans, by voice vote, shouted a resounding “AYE,” to adjourn the HCRP executive meeting.
To his dismay, only Don Hooper and two or three, others shouted “NAY” on the motion to adjourn the HCRP meeting.
As I’ve said all along, Don Hooper and his wife have wiggled, squirmed, and slithered their way into the upper ranks of the Harris County Republican Party, but they don’t have any power to do anything except carry out whisper campaigns, and sow discord, as they do the “DIRTY WORK” of “Democrat” Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, and other RINOs “Republicans in Name Only” who are lurking around under the cover of darkness on a mission to gain control of the HCRP before the upcoming 2024 Presidential cycle heats up.
Erin Elizabeth Lunceford (left), and her fellow "GOP" brothers and sisters have rightfully challenged the results of the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election in Harris County, Texas. Tamika "Tami" Craft (right), the Democrat, didn't do anything wrong, however, serious errors made by the Harris County Elections Administrator (Clifford Tatum) make determining the true outcome of the election impossible to ascertain. The mistake made on the "OFFICIAL CANVASS REPORT" that was certified back on November 22, 2022, by Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis and Harris County Commissioner Adrian Garcia showed a 789.62% turnout for Precinct #1086, in error. So, how do we know if any of the turnout numbers reported for other voting precincts are correct? You can "CLICK HERE" to see the error for yourself.
The Harris County Elections Administrator (Clifford Tatum) made serious errors in his reporting of the results for every countywide race that appeared on the November 8, 2022, Midterm Election ballot. If you look at the race for District Judge, 189th Judicial District between Tamika "Tami" Craft, the Democrat, and Erin Elizabeth Lunceford, the Republican, the Harris County Elections Administrator reported that Lunceford received 1,911 votes, and Craft received 517 votes, in Precinct #1086, which is a Republican stronghold voting precinct located in the Katy area. However, if you at the votes cast column you will see that the Harris County Elections Administrator reported that there were 2,428 votes cast in this race. But when you look at the registered votes column you will see that the Harris County Elections Administrator reported that there were only 318 registered voters in Precinct #1086, and reported a 789,62% turnout, which is a serious error. You can't have more than a 100% turnout. You can "CLICK HERE" to see the error for yourself.
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
According to the "OFFICIAL CANVASS REPORT" that was released by Harris County Elections Administrator Clifford Tatum, back on November 19, 2022, there are only (318) registered voters living in (PRECINCT #1086), which is a Republican stronghold. So, how did Erin Elizabeth Lunceford supposedly receive 1,911 votes in this precinct, and Tamika "Tami" Craft reportedly receive 517 votes, if there are only (318) registered voters in the precinct?
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
Last week Gov. Greg Abbott, announced that he was considering the possibility of calling for a new election in Harris County, Texas. Remember Gov. Abbott, tweeted that he was considering the issuance of a call for a new election. Now, in a game-changing move, Lieutenant Gov. Dan Patrick has stepped forward to call for a redo of the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Elections.
However, according to the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, only a judge can order a new election – not the Governor or Lieutenant Governor. So, it seems like what’s next? Well, in the spirit of fairness, our love for our democracy, and to restore confidence in our electoral process, a court needs to do the right thing and order a redo of the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election.
Why should a new election be declared?
The problems in Harris County, Texas on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, were much bigger than ballot paper shortages, and voters being turned away at the polls. And while I personally witnessed voters being disenfranchised at polling locations first-hand, that’s not the worst of what played out in the third largest county in America.
“VOTERS DISAPPEARED.”
Back on 11/18/2022, somehow, the “ELECTION RECONCILIATION OFFICIALS” produced a report showing that we have 2,549,262 registered voters in Harris County, Texas. And then, back on 11/19/2022, the following day, an error-filled “CUMULATIVE REPORT” was produced showing that there are 2,543,162, registered voters who registered to vote in Harris County, Texas.
If you do the math, and subtract 2,549,262, from 2,543,162, you will come up with a difference of 6,100 registered voters. “Who are those 6,100 registered voters and how did they disappear in that 24-hour period,” as Colleen M. Vera, a member of the Harris County Ballot Board.
“MAIL-BALLOT PROBLEM.”
In case you don’t know, Clifford Tatum, the Harris County Elections Administrator, reported on the “OFFICIAL RECONCILIATION REPORT” that there were 9,307 more mail ballots to count than were actually mailed out, and returned back to the County Elections Administrator’s Office by voters. “That is a serious discrepancy,” says Colleen M. Vera, who is responsible for making sure that the mail ballots are accurately recorded and counted.
“PROVISIONAL BALLOTS.”
According to Colleen M. Vera, the “PROVISIONAL BALLOTS” recorded don’t even add up. In a report she published on Texas Trash Talk, she explains, “So…after finishing counting the Election Night results, and compiling the Reconciliation Report on 11/10/2022, the Harris County EA reported having approximately 3,828 Provisional ballots to be processed.”
“By the time the final official results were posted eight days later, the Harris County EA had found approximately 2,474 additional Provisional ballots to add to his count. That’s very interesting. Where were those additional 2,474 Provisional ballots found,” she asked.
“FLAWED CANVASS REPORTS.”
A serious "RED FLAG" that indicates that something went seriously wrong (and the true results can’t be ascertained by anyone) can be found in every county-wide race that took place on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in Harris County, Texas.
One of the new precincts added during this election cycle was “PRECINCT #1086” which is a new Republican stronghold located in Katy, Texas. On the “OFFICIAL CANVASS REPORT” that was certified by Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis (Precinct One), and Harris County Commissioner Adrian Garcia (Precinct 2), the Harris County Elections Administrator reported that there was a 789% voter turnout in this Republican precinct.
Now, for the record, it’s mathematically impossible for there to be a 789% voter turnout in any voter precinct. But what I found to be even more strange, is that on this same “OFFICIAL CANVASS REPORT” that was certified on February 22, 2022, the Harris County Elections Administrator reported that there were a total of 2,511 ballots cast in “PRECINCT #1086” while reporting that there were only 318 registered voters living in this newly created precinct.
So, if Clifford Tatum, the Harris County Elections Administrator, reported (in error) that there was a 789% voter turnout in “PRECINCT #1086” this means that results of every countywide race that were held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, is flawed. Why? Well, if such an egregious error was made in PRECINCT #1086” it’s going to be next to impossible for any court to ascertain the true results of the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election in the third largest county in America.
What you have to remember is that the ballot for Harris County, Texas is the longest in the entire nation. And on top of that, the “OFFICIAL CANVASS REPORT” covers a total of (6,115) pages.
“THE ELECTION CODE.”
We’re wasting a lot of time right now with all of these “CONTESTED ELECTIONS” and lawsuits. What these lawsuits look like to me is what’s called a “money grab” from the outside looking in.
How much clearer can the Texas Election Code be? In case you don’t know, Sec.232.041 of The Texas Election Code is very clear when it comes to what should happen next in Harris County, Texas.
The way I understand it, if the true outcome of the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election as reflected in the “OFFICIAL CANVASS REPORT” is impossible to ascertain the election must be declared void, and the court must order a new election under the supervision of the court.
“GIVEN FAIR WARNING.”
What happened on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in Harris County, Texas should not have come as a surprise to anyone. Attorney “Downtown Oliver Brown” filed a bipartisan lawsuit back on March 7, 2022, at 1:07pm, on behalf of the Honorable George Risner, Pastor Richard Vega, and Bianca Gracia which is still open and active.
“SUMMARY OF CASE.”
According to attorney “Downtown’ Oliver Brown, “This case is a bi-partisan petition aimed at addressing the constitutional and statutory violations of the Harris County Elections Administrator (“Administrator”). The Administrator’s unlawful acts include intentionally, willfully, and knowingly failing to adequately allocate equipment, and paper ballots that are capable of preserving the voters’ intent, and failing to operate voting centers during the posted hours. These actions have violated and will continue to violate Petitioner's statutory right to a safe, accurate, and efficient election, to produce records that allow an accurate audit. TEX. ELEC. CODE §122.001; §§211.001.
Attorney “Downtown” Oliver Brown goes on to say, “Additionally, the Administrator violated Petitioners Texas Constitutional guarantees of equal protection, purity of the ballot box, and the right of suffrage. See TEX. CONST. ART. I, § 3, art. VI, § 2(c), art. VI, § 4.”
“This suit seeks a permanent injunction to protect Petitioners’ rights and to restore the sanctity of the votes in every political party in Harris County, Texas.”
DISCOVERY
Early Voting Statutory and Constitutional Violations
15. The HCEAO failed to properly provide equipment and ballots for each voting center. The Presiding Judge’s voter centers are to receive a full line. A “Line” is defined as full line of equipment which includes one ePollBook, one Controller, and up to 12 Duos. The voter centers received “Lines” that were missing key components to properly establish the voting center. The missing items included missing barcode readers, Duos, and ATI controllers to assist citizens with disabilities.
16. Many locations failed to have thermal ballot paper which resulted in smearing and unintelligible ballots. When ballot paper was provided it was issued in two different sizes. (8 ½” x 11” and 8 ½” x 14”). The different sizes resulted in paper jams due to the machines not being calibrated for the change in paper size.
17. Several Presiding Judges or supervisors reported that they were issued equipment, supplies, Lines, and/or ballot paper without having to sign a chain of custody.
18. Various voting centers throughout the Precincts opened later than 7:00 a.m. Other centers would close earlier than 7:00 p.m. or 10:00 p.m. in violation of the
schedule. At least one location, Kent Tice Elementary (voting center 0354) was locked and did not have proper personnel (a greeter) to open doors for candidates.
19. Both Democratic and Republican Presiding Judges, Alternate Judges, and Clerks were not adequately trained in resolving errors with checking in voters, equipment malfunctions, and guiding voters to insert their paper ballot in the ballot box for counting. This resulted in the citizen's votes not being counted.
March 1, 2022, Primary Election Statutory and Constitutional Violations
20. The previous allegations set forth in paragraphs 15-17 are incorporated herein as if set forth in their entirety.
21. Armand Bayou Elementary (voting center 0092) was closed to democratic voters. The Administrator requested the Republicans to set up and manage the Democrat Primary, but they were either unable or rightfully refused.
22. The administrator loaded the wrong precinct information for voters or posted conflicting information regarding the precinct code. On information and belief, Ted Heaps's precinct was coded to precinct 0400 and should have been in precinct 0522. The voter registration cards indicate precinct 0522 but the information provided online indicates precinct 0400.
23. Countless locations had malfunctioning equipment. Equipment was delivered to the wrong locations resulting in at least 17 locations receiving no equipment. Upon the completion of the election empty ballot boxes were not returned to the HCEAO.
24. The Elections Administrator failed to adequately staff Central Count to assist in counting damaged, mutilated, or unscannable ballots. The parties then produced additional personnel to assist in the process of determining voter intent.2 These individuals were sworn in by an unknown official. It is unclear if the swearing officer had the lawful authority to perform such an act.
Explanation of Damaged Ballots
25. The normal process for handling damaged ballots is as follows: a. When a ballot is unscannable or unable to process it is sent to a two-member team for review. Each party had two designated members.
b. If the ballots were smeared and unreadable the two-member team would review the ballot and, if necessary, determine the voter’s intent. Once the intent was determined a duplicate ballot was created based on the serial number.
c. The duplicate ballot is sent to the staff of the Central Count Team who will then print and scan the ballot thus casting the voter’s ballot.
26. In most cases in this election, the first page was not damaged; however, the second page was affected by smearing or crinkling due to the printer jamming. Fortunately, most of the first pages were undamaged or mutilated which allowed Central Count to utilize the serial number from page one to recreate page two.
27. The reason for the damage is due to the Administrator failing to ensure all machines were properly calibrated prior to being dispatched by the HCEAO.
So, like I said, what happened in Harris County, Texas should not have come as a surprise to any local count official. That being said, attorney “Downtown” Oliver Brown tried to warn everyone with the bipartisan lawsuit that he filed on behalf of his clients, but everyone ignored him. And my question is why? You can "CLICK HERE" to read the (still active) lawsuit for yourself.
"When Tony Sr. was in first grade (when dinosaurs still roamed the earth), he had different ambitions than anyone else in his class. Everyone wanted to be a doctor or a lawyer or a fireman, but not Tony Sr., he wanted to be the President of Way Mechanical. In 1996, he achieved that goal. Like most McCorvey’s that have been involved with the family business, his resume is very short. He’s been a tin bender his entire life and loves sheet metal. Tony Sr. is still heavily involved in the company and shares his guidance and vision with the employees every day."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "In my opinion, Attorney "DOWNTOWN" Oliver Brown is a true leader in the courtroom. Attorney "Downtown" Oliver Brown is a true leader in every sense of the word. He knows the way, goes the way, and does his best to lead by example and show others the way."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "In my opinion, Pastor Willie Davis is a strong leader who exemplifies what it means to be strong, resilient, courageous, and trustworthy. Pastor Willie Davis is a true leader in every sense of the word. He knows the way, goes the way, and does his best to lead by example and show others the way."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "In my opinion, Former Judge Loyd Wright is a Conservative who people from all walks of life should consider getting to know. Loyd loves us and is a fair, open-minded person who represents leadership in every sense of the word. He knows the way, goes the way, and does his best to lead by example and show others the way."
AUBREY R. TAYLOR: "In my opinion, Judge Mke Engelhart is a strong leader who respects and appreciates our unique differences. He's up for reelection in the race for Judge, 151st Civil District Court in the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election, but that's not why he's being featured here in this report. Judge Mike Engelhart knows the way, goes the way, and does his best to lead by example and show others the way."
Judge Latosha Lewis Payne is the presiding judge for the 55th Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Latosha Lewis Payne will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly-reelected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Fredericka Phillips is the presiding judge for the 61st Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Fredericka Phillips will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election. Still, she will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
- 2024 PRESIDENTIAL CYCLE -
Judge Jeralynn Manor is the presiding judge for the 80th Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Jeralynn Manor will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election but will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Cheryl Elliott Thornton is the presiding judge for the 164th Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Cheryl Elliott Thornton will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election but will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Ursula A. Hall is the presiding judge for the 165th Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Cheryl Elliott Thornton will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election but will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Hazel B. Jones is the presiding judge for the 174th Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Hazel Jones will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election but will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Nikita V. Harmon is the presiding judge for the 176th Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Nikita V. Harmon will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election. Still, she will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Robert Johnson is the presiding judge for the 177th Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Robert Johnson will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election. Still, he will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Katherine N. Thomas is the presiding judge for the 184th Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Katherine N. Thomas will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Tamika “Tami” Craft is the presiding judge for the 189th Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Tamika “Tami” Craft will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Beverly D. Armstrong is the presiding judge for the 208th Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Beverly D. Armstrong will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Elaine H. Palmer is the presiding judge for the 215th Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Elaine H. Palmer will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election. Still, she will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Angela M. Lancelin is the presiding judge for the 245th Family District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Angela M. Lancelin will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Angela Graves Harrington is the presiding judge for the 246th Family District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Angela Graves Harrington will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly-reelected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Sandra J. Peake is the presiding judge for the 257th Family District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Sandra J. Peake will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly reelected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Lori Chambers Gray is the presiding judge for the 262nd Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Lori Chambers Gray will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Melissa M. Morris is the presiding judge for the 263rd Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Melissa M. Morris will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Dedra Davis is the presiding judge for the 270th Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Dedra Davis will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Damiane “Dianne” Curvey is the presiding judge for the 280th Family District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge “Damiane “Dianne” Curvey will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Germaine Tanner is the presiding judge for the 311th Family District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Germaine Tanner will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Michelle Moore is the presiding judge for the 314th Juvenile District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Michelle Moore will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly-reelected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Brittanye Morris is the presiding judge for the 333rd Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Brittanye Morris will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election but will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Dawn Rogers is the presiding judge for the 334th Civil District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Dawn Rogers will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election but will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Ramona Franklin is the presiding judge for the 338th Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Judge Ramona Franklin will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election but will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Veronica M. Nelson is the presiding judge for the 482nd Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas. Veronica M. Nelson will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Shannon Baldwin is the presiding judge for County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 in Harris County, Texas. Judge Shannon Baldwin will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly-reelected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Toria J. Finch is the presiding judge for County Criminal Court at Law No. 9 in Harris County, Texas. Judge Toria J. Finch will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Juanita Jackson is the presiding judge for County Criminal Court at Law No. 10 in Harris County, Texas. Judge Juanita Jackson will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Sedrick T. Walker II is the presiding judge for County Criminal Court at Law No. 11 in Harris County, Texas. Judge Sedrick T. Walker II will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, he was just duly reelected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Genesis Draper is the presiding judge for County Criminal Court at Law No. 12 in Harris County, Texas. Judge Genesis Draper will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Tonya Jones is the presiding judge for County Criminal Court at Law No. 15 in Harris County, Texas. Judge Tonya Jones will be up for reelection in the 2026 Midterm Election, she was just duly elected in the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, for Harris County, Texas.
Judge Darrell Jordan is the presiding judge for County Criminal Court at Law No. 16 in Harris County, Texas. Judge Darrell Jordan will be up for reelection in the 2024 Presidential Election but will have to earn the nomination to serve as the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, in the Democratic Party Primary, for Harris County, Texas.