The Texas Rangers should take a very close look at the race for Judge, 183rd Criminal District Court, the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 2, 3, and 14, that took place on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, in the Midterm Election. You can "CLICK HERE" for race results. Also, please understand that it's nearly impossible for the differential in the race for Judge, 183rd Criminal District Court to be (267) votes, and the differential in the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 3, to be (2,676) votes, which is exactly the same, with the exception of the (6) six added to the end.
Mathematical Improbabilities Uncovered in Two Judicial Races Could Give the Texas Rangers a Good Starting Point
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
You don’t have to be a mathematician to figure out that something is wrong with the “UNOFFICIAL CUMULATIVE REPORT” that was released by the County Elections Administrator Clifford Tatum on Friday, November 18, 2022, at 7:20 P.M., in Harris County, Texas.
What’s wrong? Well, for starters, anyone with half a brain, should be able to understand that the likelihood of two down-ballot judicial races with over 1 million votes cast ending up with “THE SAME EXACT MARGIN OF VICTORY NUMBERS” minus the number (6) six on the end, is very suspicious.
I’m not kidding!!! The race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 3, between Leslie Johnson (Republican) and Porscha Natasha Brown (Democrat), ended up with only a (267) two hundred sixty-seven vote differential.
How could the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 3, end up with a (267) two hundred and six-seven vote differential, and the race for Judge, 183rd Criminal District Court between Kristin M. Guiney and Gemayel L. Haynes end up with a (2,676) two thousand seventy-six vote differential?
If you look closely at the aforementioned differentials, the only difference between (267) and (2,676) is the number (6) tacked on to the end of two thousand six hundred and seventy-six.
If you “CLICK HERE” and look at the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election ballot for Harris County, Texas, what you’re going to quickly discover is that there were (39) thirty-nine local judicial races that fell between the race for Judge, 183rd Criminal District Court, and the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 3.
When you look at the fact that there were (39) thirty-nine down-ballot judicial races between the two aforementioned races on the ballot, the likelihood of the (267) and (2,676) occurring naturally is highly unlikely – next to impossible!
"If this mathematical improbability had occurred in two down-ballot races that followed right behind one another on the ballot, I could somewhat understand how something like this could happen."
-----------------------------------------------
But there were (39) thirty-nine down-ballot judicial races sitting between the race for Judge, 183rd Criminal District Court, and the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 3, as voters made their down-ballot selections. So, how could this mathematical improbability happen?
What’s mathematical improbability?
According to Wikipedia, “Probability is the branch of mathematics concerning numerical descriptions of how likely an event is to occur, or how likely it is that a proposition is true. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where, roughly speaking, 0 indicates the impossibility of the event and 1 indicates certainty. The higher the probability of an event, the more likely it is that the event will occur. A simple example is the tossing of a fair (unbiased) coin. Since the coin is fair, the two outcomes ("heads" and "tails") are both equally probable; the probability of "heads" equals the probability of "tails"; and since no other outcomes are possible, the probability of either "heads" or "tails" is 1/2 (which could also be written as 0.5 or 50%).”
So, how likely is it that two down-ballot “BLACK DEMOCRATIC JUDICIAL CANDIDATES” by the name of Gemayel L. Haynes and Porscha Natasha Brown lose their races by “THE SAME IDENTICAL NUMBER” when the number (6) six on the end is removed?
Again, it’s highly improbable (unlikely) that the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 3, would be won by (267) two hundred and sixty-seven votes, and the race for Judge, 183rd Criminal District Court was won by (2,676) two thousand six hundred and seventy-six votes.
And what’s also very concerning to me, is the fact that all four of the down-ballot “BLACK DEMOCRATIC JUDICIAL CANDIDATES” lost to Republican candidates who did not even run campaigns against them. And on top of that, Judge Ronnisha Bowman, who was serving as the presiding judge for County Criminal Court at Law No. 2 was the only incumbent to lose her bench.
For the record, former Judge Paula Goodhart showed “ZER0” contributions, and “ZERO” expenditures on her campaign finance report that was filed on October 31, 2022, under penalty of perjury. You can "CLICK HERE" to view the report for yourself.
So, just for the record, you can “CLICK HERE” to view “THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT” that was filed by Paula Goodhart on 10/31/2022, in the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 2, which shows “ZERO” Contributions, and “ZERO” expenditures spent by Paula Goodhart between 9/30/2022 and 10/29/2022, in her winning effort against her Black Democratic opponent.
So, just for the record, you can “CLICK HERE” to view “THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT” that was filed by Jessica N. Padilla on 10/10/2022, in the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 14, which Jessica N. Padilla only received $200 in political contributions, but she immediately reimbursed herself a partial payment $200 on 9/30/2022, for some signs that she had purchased for her campaign.
Jessica Padilla received a $100 donation from Linda Garcia on 9/29/2022, and a $100 donation from Claud Edward Rountree on 7/11/2022, according to her “CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT” that was filed on 10/10/2022, under penalty of perjury. While nothing is wrong with receiving donations, the quickness of the reimbursement is worth mentioning.
The expenditure for the signs purchased by Jessica N. Padilla was in the amount of $523, which she paid by credit card on September 4, 2022, according to her “CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT” that was filed on 10/10/2022, under penalty of perjury.
Jessica N. Padilla filed her most recent “CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT” on 10/28/2022, which showed that she had given her campaign a $75 non-monetary in-kind contribution, and had received a $50 donation from a retired woman by the name of Patricia Phillips, and according to her most recently filed “CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT” only has $50 in political contributions inside of her campaign bank account.
Any legitimate investigation into the “VOTER SUPPRESSION” and “VOTER IRREGULARITIES” that unfolded in Harris County, Texas must begin with the race for Judge, 183rd Criminal District Court, and the race for Judge, County Criminal Court at Law No. 3, in my unbiased opinion.
Well, where there’s smoke there’s fire!!!
Let me make myself perfectly clear!!! It’s not human error or a clerical mistake that Gemayel L. Haynes (Democrat), who happens to be a Black male, lost to Kristin M. Guiney (Republican) by a mere (2,676) votes, and then, (39) thirty-nine races down-ballot, another "BLACK DEMOCRAT JUDICIAL CANDIDATE" by the name of Porscha Natasha Brown (Democrat), lost by (267) votes, to her Republican opponent.
In closing, what’s unfolding in Harris County, Texas right now appears to be some sort of “POLITICAL HEIST” that appears to have been orchestrated by some sort of “CRIMINAL REGIME” that could have players on both sides of the political aisle from the way things are beginning to unfold.
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
For the record, at 2:37 P.M. on Saturday, November 20, 2022, (yesterday), I received a text message from Harris County Republican Party Chairman Cindy Siegel that sheds new light on the direction of my pending investigation into the “ELECTION DAY DEBACLE” and “VOTER SUPPRESSION PLOT” in Harris County, Texas may head once the “CANVASSING OF THE ELECTION” is complete and the final results are certified.
The text from Cindy Siegel stated, “Ask the firm who was supposed to do the vetting and narrowing the candidate list why they didn’t do their job.”
According to Cindy Siegel, “I have heard that he (Clifford Tatum) got on that shortlist because of someone on the commissioner's court.” Is she talking about Commissioner Rodney Ellis?
“Also, headhunters have done work for the city of Houston,” she stated.
She went on to explain, “I am the one who moved to rescind the offer and it failed for lack of a second.”
“Then all four of the other election commissioners called the question to appoint him (Clifford Tatum) so that I couldn’t bring it out as part of the public record with a discussion on appointing him (Clifford Tatum) as the (EA) Election Administrator,” Cindy Siegel shared.
As we all now know, Cindy Siegel is the lone Republican sitting on “THE HARRIS COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION” that’s comprised of Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo (Democrat), Harris County Democratic Party Chairman Odus Evbagharu (Democrat), Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth (Democrat), and Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector Ann Harris Bennett.
When the final vote on Clifford Tatum being hired was complete, the four Democrats outvoted Cindy Siegel (4 to 1) in favor of appointing him as the Harris County Elections Administrator.
After carefully reviewing “THE RECONCILIATION REPORT” that was signed off on by C.A. Thomas on Friday, November 18, 2022, it’s evidently clear to me that something horrible is unfolding in Harris County, Texas.
From what I can see, Clifford Tatum appears to have been brought into Harris County, Texas as the perfect “SCAPEGOAT” to pull off what appears to be a “POLITICAL HEIST” more than a fair and honest “POLITICAL CONTEST" between Republicans and Democrats.
From the way things appear right now, this Clifford Tatum ‘cat’ appears to be another puppet for the man most Harris County insiders have identified as the “PUPPET MASTER” because of the vast number of puppets he wields complete power over other elected officials in our local city and county government.
Who is the “PUPPET MASTER” I’m talking about? If you have to ask me that question, you may as well go and play around on Facebook, or go check out the propaganda being peddled as news stories in the “HOUSTON COMICAL” or something.
THE FAMILY
Mayor Sylvester Turner and Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis could possibly be two of the most corrupt public officials in America. But of these two, “ALLEGED CRIME BOSSES” the undisputed leader is the “PUPPET MASTER” himself, none other than Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis, the (Precinct One Commissioner) who controls city and county government in the third largest county in America. Mayor Sylvester Turner is nothing more than one of the minions of Commissioner Ellis.
THE PUPPET
Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis (left), and Harris County Elections Administrator Clifford Tatum (right), appear to be trying to play the citizens of Harris County, Texas for stupid. Don’t these two men understand that everyone with a brain (mind of their own) is beginning to come to the realization that the chaos that erupted on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 (Election Day Morning), in Harris County, Texas appears to be a manufactured distraction?
Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis espoused these words about Clifford Tatum several months ago before his hiring, “Over the past three years, Harris County has transformed the way we manage elections and became a national model for election access. Through innovative changes such as countywide polling places, drive-thru voting, 24-hour voting, new voting machines, and record numbers of polling places, we’ve knocked down barriers to the ballot box, even with COVID and the State’s voter suppression efforts in the backdrop.”
“I’m confident that the best is yet to come and look forward to working with our new Elections Administrator Clifford Tatum to take Harris County’s elections to new heights even in these challenging times,” said Commissioner Ellis.
Commissioner Rodney Ellis went on to proclaim, “Voters should know that we are making every effort to protect and advance their sacred right to vote in November because the stakes have never been higher for our democracy.”
THE LAWSUIT
According to Cindy Siegel, the chairman of the Harris County Republican Party, “On Monday, the Harris County Republican Party sued Tatum and the county in state court, alleging election code violations.”
She said via her Facebook account, “The suit accused Democratic county leaders of suppressing the vote with poll closings, broken machines, incorrect ballot tabulation and ballot shortages in what party officials described as more than two dozen conservative-leaning precincts.”
“‘We’ve seen what’s turned out to be a systemic cancer in how Harris County runs its elections,’ said Cindy Siegel in a recent press briefing she held.
You can "CLICK HERE" to view "THE BOOK ON CLIFFORD TATUM" which was compiled by a private investigator by the name of Patti James Investigations (TX DPS License A-6575) 207 Somerset Knolls Ct. Houston, Texas 77094.
Judge Dasean Jones (Democrat), according to the numbers released by the Harris County Elections Administrator (Clifford Tatum) received 31,914 mail-ballot votes, and Tami Pierce (Republican), received 24,814 mail-ballot votes. You can "CLICK HERE" other race results.
Judge Dasean Jones (Democrat), according to the numbers released by the Harris County Elections Administrator (Clifford Tatum) received 166,669 votes on Election Day. Comparatively speaking, Tami Pierce (Republican), received 168,288 votes on Election Day. You can "CLICK HERE" other race results.
Judge Dasean Jones (Democrat), according to the numbers released by the Harris County Elections Administrator (Clifford Tatum) received 534,460 total votes. Comparatively speaking, Tami Pierce (Republican), received 534,460 total votes. You can "CLICK HERE" other race results.
"THE ALTERNATE JUDGE CLAIMED TO BE A REPUBLICAN WORKING THE HIRAM CLARKE EARLY VOTING LOCATION."
Aubrey R. Taylor, publisher of Houston Business Connections Newspaper, Dr. Steven Hotze, publisher of Conservative Republicans of Texas News, (also Founder of the Liberty Center for God & Country), and Weston Martinez, president of The Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigations at "THE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH" protest and rally against "CORRUPTION" and "VOTER SUPPRESSION" on Tuesday, November 15, 2022, in downtown Houston in front of the Harris County Commissioners Court Building located 1001 Preston Street.
AUBREY R. TAYLOR REPORTS©
Can you believe that a Houston Chronicle Reporter by the name of Sam Gonzalez Kelly tried to discredit me by labeling me as a right-wing blogger? Laughable!!!
On Tuesday, November 8, 2022, “THE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW” braved the cold and windy morning in downtown Houston, Texas to deliver a strong and powerful message. What was their message? “We’re sick and tired of these dirt politicians conspiring together to steal the election in the third largest county in America.”
In case you don’t know, I’ve been informed by a credible source that a cyber-security team employed by Dr. Steven Hotze, the publisher of Conservative Republicans of Texas News has discovered that as many as 66,000 votes may have been illegally cast in Harris County, Texas in the 2022 Midterm Election. And that’s not even including the “DEAD PEOPLE” who are currently registered to vote in Harris County, Texas right now.
As it stands right now, if Dr. Hotze’s cyber-security team is correct, every down-ballot contested race could be affected by this new development; but that’s a story for a later time.
Yesterday, I provided several news reporters with information and facts about voter fraud in Harris County, Texas which was totally ignored in their news reports throughout the day, and last night. Why? Well, what we appear to have deeply embedded in Harris County is beginning to look like a “CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE” that has some sort of hold over the local media, and perhaps even members of the local judiciary, and local government officials.
HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF ‘THE UNIPARTY’ BEFORE?
I can’t think of any logical explanation for why the local news media would be providing the local Democratic Party with so much cover. In their defense, many of the local reporters I spoke with yesterday, at “THE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW” protest and rally, seemed surprised when I gave them proof of the fact that District Attorney Kim Ogg, has opened a “CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION” into Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s Campaign; but none of them published that fact last night.
For the record, I provided local reporters like Jeff Ehling with Channel 13, copies of the death certificate and voter records to prove that a woman by the name of Kathleen Hooey, is still on the Harris County Voter Rolls after having died more than 31 years ago – but he didn’t even mention that fact in his news report. Why? Never mind, I think that we all know why!!!
Anyways, I also showed the “VOTER REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE” to reporters from Channel 2, Channel 11, Channel 13, and Channel 26; which clearly shows that someone renewed Kathleen Hooey’s voter registration card back on January 1, 2022, even though she’s been dead for 31 years. So, why didn’t the Houston Chronicle, or the reporters from all of the news stations I interviewed yesterday, use my comments? And why are they providing so much cover for local Democrats?
If you don’t believe me, take a look at this “HIT PIECE” that was published in the Houston Chronicle about “THE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW” protest and rally that took place yesterday in front of the Harris County Commissioner’s Court Building yesterday. You can “CLICK HERE” to read the “HIT PIECE” that was published in the Houston Chronicle in their attempt to discredit what took place.
What we’re seeing play out in Harris County as some local news stations try to protect their Democratic allies are beginning to look a lot like “POLITICAL WITCH HUNTS” that are being waged to discredit anyone who holds an opposing view to the propaganda they're pushing.
What’s propaganda? Well, in simple terms, propaganda is misleading information that’s being peddled to the public by local media outlets aimed at promoting/publicizing their political cause and viewpoint. And that’s exactly what the Houston Chronicle Reporter (Sam Gonzalez Kelly) did yesterday in his report titled, “Dozens of protesters allege, without evidence, widespread fraud in Harris County election,” which was published at 5:09 p.m., on their website.
For starters, notice the headline, the words, “WITHOUT EVIDENCE” in the title serve as the first sign that (Sam Gonzalez Kelly), the Houston Chronicle staff writer, is biased, unfair, and about to publish a “HIT PIECE” aimed at discrediting some folks.
Secondly, in the first paragraph of his report, (Sam Gonzalez Kelly), the Houston Chronicle staff writer, shows his bias by describing Dr. Steven Hotze, the founder of the Liberty Center for God and Country, and publisher of Conservative Republicans of Texas News as a “HIGH-PROFILE ELECTION DENIER” in what clearly establishes his report as a “HIT PIECE” being published to discredit Dr. Hotze, and everyone associated with the “PROTEST AGAINST CORRUPTION AND VOTER SUPPRESSION” that was held yesterday, in front of the Harris County Commissioner’s Court Building at 1001 Preston.
Thirdly, in the second paragraph of his report, (Sam Gonzalez Kelly), the Houston Chronicle staff writer, shows his bias by using the words, “BLACK ANTI-VIOLENCE GROUP” to describe “THE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW” in an attempt to place a label on the group. Who told Sam Gonzalez Kelly, that “THE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW” was comprised of only Black people?
Fourthly, also in the second paragraph of his report, (Sam Gonzalez Kelly), tries to discredit Weston Martinez, (one of the speakers), and president of The Voter Fraud Bureau of Investigations as a loser by describing Martinez as San Antonio Republican, who lost the primary for Texas Land Commissioner in March, and pointing out the fact that Martinez isn’t Black.
So, can you now see, how local media outlets like the Houston Chronicle appear to be acting as media allies for what appears to be “A HIGHLY ORGANIZED EFFORT OF SOME SORT” in Harris County, Texas?
Now, in my professional opinion, “THE UNIPARTY” has been active in Harris County, Texas for several years already. That’s why Clifford Tatum, the new Harris County Elections Administrator was hired and brought in from the swamp in Washington D.C., right before the Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Midterm Election, even though he had already botched elections before.
Haven’t you seen this playbook before? Do you remember Chris Hollins, (who was serving as the finance chair with the Texas Democratic Party), is brought in to oversee the 2020 Presidential Election in Harris County after Diane Trautman was forced to resign?
Anyways, labeling Americans who dare to question election results as “CONSPIRACY THEORIST” and “ELECTION DENIERS” is nothing more than a bullying tactic likened to what’s playing out on grade school campuses in cities all across America.
For the record, “THE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH CREW” doesn’t appear to be a group that’s intimidated, dismayed, discouraged, or dissuaded by the elementary school tactics that were put on full display by the Houston Chronicle Newspaper, and their “BIASED A$$” report who tried to throw shade on their peaceful “PROTEST AGAINST CORRUPTION” and “VOTER SUPPRESSION” that took place at the Harris County Commissioner’s Court Building on Tuesday, November 15, 2022, in downtown Houston, Texas.
"The First Amendment (1791) prohibits Congress from obstructing the exercise of certain individual freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and right to petition. Its Free Exercise Clause guarantees a person's right to hold whatever religious beliefs they want, and to freely exercise that belief, and its Establishment Clause prevents the federal government from creating an official national church or favoring one set of religious beliefs over another. The amendment guarantees an individual's right to express and to be exposed to a wide range of opinions and views. It was intended to ensure a free exchange of ideas, even unpopular ones. It also guarantees an individual's right to physically gather or associate with others in groups for economic, political, or religious purposes. Additionally, it guarantees an individual's right to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
"The First Amendment (1791) prohibits Congress from obstructing the exercise of certain individual freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and right to petition. Its Free Exercise Clause guarantees a person's right to hold whatever religious beliefs they want, and to freely exercise that belief, and its Establishment Clause prevents the federal government from creating an official national church or favoring one set of religious beliefs over another. The amendment guarantees an individual's right to express and to be exposed to a wide range of opinions and views. It was intended to ensure a free exchange of ideas, even unpopular ones. It also guarantees an individual's right to physically gather or associate with others in groups for economic, political, or religious purposes. Additionally, it guarantees an individual's right to petition the government for a redress of grievances."